Translate

#365papers

2017:
  1. Hanzelka & Reif 2016. Effects of vegetation structure on the diversity of breeding bird communities in forest stands of non-native black pine (Pinus nigra A.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in the Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management
  2. García 2016. Birds in ecological networks: insights from bird-plant mutualistic interactions. Ardeola
  3. Podani et al. 2014. A new approach to exploring architecture of bipartite (interaction) ecological networks. Journal of Complex Networks
  4. Luck et al. 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology
  5. Lewinsohn et al. 2006. Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos
  6. Blüthgen 2010. Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide. Basic and Applied Ecology
  7. Cayuela et al. 2012. taxonstand: An r package for species names standardisation in vegetation databases. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  8. Hopkins 1957. The concept of minimal area. Journal of Ecology
  9. Smith 2017. Solutions for loss of information in high-beta-diversity community data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  10. Wiser 2016. Achievements and challanges in the integration, reuse and synthesis of vegetation plot data. Journal of Vegetation Science
  11. Vadász et al. 2016. Quantifying the diversifying potential of conservation management systems: An evidence-based conceptual model for managing species-rich grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
  12. Grimaldi & Engel 2007. Why descriptive science matters. BioScience
  13. Guillot & Rousset 2013. Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  14. Morueta-Holme et al. 2016. A network approach for inferring species associations from co-occurrence data. Ecography
  15. Díaz et al. 2016. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature
  16. Spasojevic et al. 2014. Using functional diversity patterns to explore metacommunity dynamics: a framework for understanding local and regional influences on community structure. Ecography
  17. Smith et al. 2017. Could ecologists be more random? Straightforward alternatives to haphazard spatial sampling. Ecography
  18. Baddeley et al. 2014. On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes. Ecological Monographs
  19. Li & Ives 2017. The statistical need to include phylogeny in trait-based analyses of community composition. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  20. König et al. 2016. Dissecting global turnover in vascular plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography
  21. Mihók et al. 2017. Biodiversity on the waves of history: Conservation in a changing social and institutional environment in Hungary, a post-soviet EU member state. Biological Conservation
  22. Fajmonová et al. 2012. Distribution of habitat specialists in semi-natural grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science
  23. Wilkinson 2004. The long history of biotic homogenization concept. TREE
  24. Olden & Leroy Poff 2004. Clarifying biotic homogenization. TREE
  25. Pillar et al. 2009. Discriminating trait‐convergence and traitdivergence assembly patterns in ecological community gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science
  26. Penksza 2003. Festuca pseudovaginata, a new species from sandy areas of the Carpathian Basin. Acta Botanica Hungarica
  27. Smarda et al. 2007. Revision of Central European taxa of Festuca ser. Psammophilae Pawlus: morphometrical, karyological and AFLP analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution
  28. Torrecilla & Catalán 2002. Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineages (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Systematic Botany
  29. König et al. 2017. Dissecting global turnover in vascular plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography
  30. Tredennick et al. 2017. The relationship between species and ecosystem variability is shaped by the mechanism of coexistence. Ecology Letters
  31. Ellison & Degrassi 2017. All species are important, but some species are more important than others. Journal of Vegetation Science
  32. Shipley et al. 2017. Predicting habitat affinities of plant species using commonly measured functional traits. Journal of Vegetation Science
  33. Dwyer & Laughlin 2017. Selection on trait combinations along environmental gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science
  34. Read et al. 2017. Intraspecific variation in traits reduces ability of trait-based models to predict community structure. Journal of Vegetation Science
  35. Schöb et al. 2012. Foundation species influence trait-based community assembly. New Phytologist
  36. Loiseau et al. 2017. Performance of partitioning functional beta-diversity indices: influence of functional representation and partitioning methods. Global Ecology and Biogeography
  37. Fekete et al. 2017. Roadside verges as habitats for endangered lizard-orchids (Himantoglossum spp.): Ecological traps or refuges? Science of The Total Environment
  38. Rodríguez-Rojo et al. 2017. Diversity of lowland hay meadows and pastures in Western and Central Europe. Applied Vegetation Science
  39. E.-Vojtkó et al. 2017. Clonal vs leaf-height-seed (LHS) traits: which are filtered more strongly across habitats? Folia Geobotanica

2016:
  1. Hodgson et al. 2005. A functional method for classifying European grasslands for use in joint ecological and economic studies. Basic and Applied Ecology
  2. Naeem 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology
  3. Dengler et al. 2014. Biodiversity of Palearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
  4. Ricklefs & Jenkins 2011. Biogeography and ecology: towards the integration of two disciplines. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
  5. Violle et al. 2014. The emergence and promise of functional biogeography. PNAS
  6. Westoby et al. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
  7. Kang et al. 2015. Functional redundancy instead of species redundancy determines community stability in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. PLoS One
  8. Sasaki et al. 2009. Two-phase functional redundancy in plant communities along a grazing gradient in Mongolian rangelands. Ecology
  9. Beck et al. 2012. What's on the horizon for macroecology? Ecography
  10. Fetzer et al. 2015 The extent of functional redundancy changes as species' roles shift in different environments. PNAS
  11. Fitzpatrick et al. 2013. Environmental and historical imprints on beta diversity: insights from variation in rates of species turnover along gradients. Proc. R. Soc. B.
  12. Westoby & Wright 2006. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. TREE
  13. Hejcman et al. 2013. Origin and history of grasslands in Central Europe - a review. Grass and Forage Science
  14. Johnson & Stinchcombe 2007. An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. TREE
  15. Kahmen & Poschlod 2008. Effects of grassland management on plant functional trait composition. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
  16. Hutcheson 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology
  17. Heip & Engels 1974. Comparing species diversity and evenness indices. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.
  18. Ricotta & Moretti 2011. CWM and Rao's quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia
  19. Botta-Dukát & Czúcz 2016. Testing the ability of functional diversity indices to detect trait convergence and divergence using individual-based simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  20. Mouchet et al. 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology
  21. Vachelard et al. 2016. A guide to scientific crowdfunding. PLoS Biology
  22. Bennett & Gilbert 2016. Contrasting beta divetsity among regions: how do classical and multivariate approaches compare? Global Ecology and Biogeography
  23. Kraft et al. 2011. Disentangling the drivers of β diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients. Science
  24. Chao et al. 2012. Proposing a resolution to debates on diversity partitioning. Ecology
  25. Swenson et al. 2016. Constancy in functional space across a species richness anomaly. The American Naturalist
  26. Wellnitz & LeRoy Poff 2001. Functional redundancy in heterogeneous environments: implications for conservation. Ecology Letters
  27. Rosenfeld 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos
  28. Pillar et al. 2013.Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science
  29. Keddy 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science
  30. Wasserstein & Lazar 2016. The ASA's statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician
  31. Leek & Peng 2015. Statistics: P values are just the tip of the iceberg. Nature
  32. Brodie et al. 2014. Secondary extinctions of biodiversity. TREE
  33. Karger et al. 2015. The importance of species pool size for community composition. Ecography
  34. Karger et al. 2016. Delineating probabilistic species pools in ecology and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography
  35. Wirth & Gyergyák 2015. Az Asparagus verticillatus L. Magyarországon. Kitaibelia
  36. Isbell et al. 2011. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature
  37. Pandey & Singh 2011. A simple, cost-effective method for leaf area estimation. Journal of Botany
  38. Spotswood et al. 2012. How safe is mist netting? evaluating the risk of injury and mortality to birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  39. Marques et al. 2013. Optimizing sampling design to deal with mist-net avoidance in Amazonian birds and bats. PLoS ONE
  40. Hooper et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs
  41. Cardinale et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature
  42. Díaz & Cabido 2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. TREE
  43. Stoate et al. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe - A review. Journal of Environmental Management
  44. Petchey & Gaston 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters
  45. Srivastava & Vellend 2005. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
  46. Ricotta & Burrascano 2008. Beta diversity for functional ecology. Preslia
  47. Swenson et al. 2010. Deterministic tropical tree community turnover: evidence from patterns of functional beta diversity along an elevational gradient. Proc. R. Soc. B
  48. Díaz et al. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS
  49. Jenni-Eiermann et al. 2014. Oxidative Stress in Endurance Flight: An Unconsidered Factor in Bird Migration. PLoS ONE
  50. Roberts 2015. Vegetation classification by two new iterative reallocation optimization algorithms. Plant Ecology
  51. McCune 2015. The front door to the fourth corner: variations on the sample unit × trait matrix in community ecology. Community Ecology
  52. Hahs & McDonnell 2016. Moving beyond biotic homogenization: searching for new insights into vegetation dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science
  53. Szava-Kovats & Pärtel 2014. Biodiversity patterns along ecological gradients: unifying β-diversity indices. PLoS ONE
  54. Schamp et al. 2016. The impact of non-reproductive plant species on assessments of community structure and species co-occurrence patterns. Journal of Vegetation Science
  55. Craven et al. 2016. Plant diversity effects on grassland productivity are robust to both nutrient enrichment and drought. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
  56. Lyons et al. 2016. Model-based assessment of ecological community classifications. Journal of Vegetation Science
  57. Fox 2013. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. TREE
  58. Goncalves-Souza et al. 2013. A critical analysis of the ubiquity of linear local-regional richness relationships. Oikos
  59. Rutherford et al. 2012. The South African National Vegetation Database: History, development, applications, problems and future. South African Journal of Science
  60. De Bello et al. 2016. Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates. Ecology and Evolution
  61. Zobel 2016. The species pool concept as a framework for studying patterns of plant diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science
  62. Pärtel et al. 2016. Macroecology of biodiversity: disentangling local and regional effects. New Phytologist
  63. De Cáceres & Legendre 2008. Beals smoothing revisited. Oecologia
  64. Lepš 2001. Species-pool hypothesis: Limits to its testing. Folia Geobotanica
  65. Bryn et al. 2015. Location of plant species in Norway gathered as a part of a survey vegetation mapping programme. Data in Brief
  66. Helm et al. 2014. Characteristic and derived diversity: implementing the species pool concept to quantify conservation condition of habitats. Diversity & Distributions
  67. Szava-Kovats et al. 2012. The local-regional species richness relationship: new perspectives on the null-hypothesis. Oikos
  68. Eriksson 1993. The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity. Oikos
  69. Ricotta et al. 2016. A family of functional dissimilarity measures for presence and absence data. Ecology and Evolution
  70. Yuan et al. 2016. Ten simple rules for writing a postdoctoral fellowship. PLoS Computational Biology
  71. Bagi & Székely 2006. Az Elymus elongatus (Host) Runemark, magas tarackbúza előfordulása a Kiskunság déli részén - a korábbi lelőhelyek rövid áttekintés. Botanikai Közlemények
  72. Fekete et al. 2016. Delineation of the Pannonian vegetation region. Community Ecology
  73. Cox & Gaston 2016. Urban bird feeding: connecting people with nature. PLoS One
  74. Bozó et al. 2016. Can we explain vagrancy in Europe with the autumn migration phenology of Siberian warbler species in East Russia? Ornis Hungarica
  75. Harnos et al. 2015. Hitchhikers’ guide to analysing bird ringing data Part 1: data cleaning, preparation and exploratory analyses. Ornis Hungarica
  76. Harnos et al. 2016. Hitchhikers’ guide to analysing bird ringing data Part 2: distributions, summary statistics and outliers. Ornis Hungarica
  77. Pallmann et al. 2012. Assessing group differences in biodiversity by simultaneously testing a user-defined selection of diversity indices. Molecular Ecology Resources
  78. Barde & Barde 2012. What to use to express the variability of data: Standard deviation or standard error of mean? Perspectives in Clinical Research
  79. Altman & Bland 2005. Standard deviations and standard errors. BMJ
  80. Bogdanović & Brullo 2015. Taxonomic revision of the Limonium cancellatum group (Plumbaginaceae) in Croatia. Phytotaxa
  81. Bulgarella & Heimpel 2015. Host range and community structure of avian nest parasites in the genus Philornis (Diptera: Muscidae) on the island of Trinidad. Ecology & Evolution
  82. Pärtel 2014. Community ecology of absent species: hidden and dark diversity. Journal of Vegetation Scienc
  83. Anastasiu & Memedemin 2012. Conyza sumatrensis: a new alien plant in Romania. Botanica Serbica
  84. Milović 2004. Naturalised species from the genus Conyza Less. (Asteraceae) in Croatia. Acta Botanica Croatica
  85. Vladimirov 2009. Erigeron sumatrensis (Asteraceae): a recently recognized alien species in the Bulgarian flora. Phytologia Balcanica
  86. McArdle Anderson 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology
  87. Anderson 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis variance. Austral Ecology
  88. Cornell & Harrison 2014. What are species pools and when are they important? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
  89. Newbold et al. 2016. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science
  90. Warton et al. 2016. Three points to consider when choosing a LM or GLM test for count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  91. Vellend 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology
  92. Ohse et al. 2016. Salivary cues: simulated roe deer browsing induces systemic changes in phytohormones and defence chemistry in wild-grown maple and beech saplings. Functional Ecology
  93. Cardoso et al. 2015. BAT – Biodiversity Assessment Tools, an R package for themeasurement and estimation of alpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  94. Baselga & Orme 2012. betapart: an R package for the study of betadiversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  95. Giam & Olden 2016. Quantifying variable importance in a multimodel inference framework. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  96. Csősz et al. 2016. Maternal genetic ancestry and legacy of 10th century AD Hungarians. Scientific Reports
  97. Bruelheide 2016. Cocktail clustering - a new hierarchical agglomerative algorithm for extracting species groups in vegetation databases. Journal of Vegetation Science
  98. Chao et al. 2010. Proposing a resolution to debates on diversity partitioning. Ecology
  99. Pavoine & Ricotta 2014. Functional and phylogenetic  similarity among communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  100. Bacaro et al. 2012. Testing fir differences in beta diversity from plot-to-plot dissimilarities. Ecological Research
  101. Austen et al. 2016. Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides. Scientific Reports
  102. Guidetti et al. 2014. Against Nature? Why ecologists should not diverge from natural history. Vie et Milieu - Life and Environment
  103. Marcon et al. 2014. The decomposition of similarity-based diversity and its bias correction. <hal-00989454v1>
  104. Ricklefs 2012. Naturalists, natural history, and the nature of biological diversity. The American Naturalist
  105. Ricotta & Bacaro 2010. On plot-to-plot dissimilarity measures based on species functional traits. Community Ecology
  106. Rossi 2011. rich: An R Package to Analyse Species Richness. Diversity
  107. Woodland 2007. Are botanists becoming the dinosaurs of biology in the 21st century? South African Journal of Botany
  108. Greene 2005. Organisms in nature as a central focus for biology. TREE
  109. Vellend et al. 2014. Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities. Oikos
  110. Tewksbury et al. 2014. Natural History's Place in Science and Society. BioScience
  111. Bartholomew 1986. The Role of Natural History in Contemporary Biology. BioScience
  112. Copete et al. 1999. Differences in wing shape between sedentary and migratory Reed Buntings Emberiza schoeniclus. Bird Study
  113. Ricotta & Pavoine 2015. Measuring similarity among plots including similarity among species: an extension of traditional approaches. Journal of Vegetation Science
  114. Schütz & Schulze 2015. Functional diversity of urban bird communities: effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover. Ecology & Evolution
  115. Májeková et al. 2016. Evaluating Functional Diversity: Missing Trait Data and the Importance of Species Abundance Structure and Data Transformation. PLoS ONE
  116. Morelli et al. 2017. Cuckoo as indicator of high functional diversity of bird communities: A new paradigm for biodiversity surrogacy. Ecological Indicators
  117. Fibich et al. 2016. Root hemiparasitic plants are associated with high diversity in temperate grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science
  118. Zajac et al. 2016. Classification of semi-natural mesic grasslands in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Phytocoenologia
  119. Ricotta et al. 2016. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: A quantitative guide. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  120. Storch 2016. The theory of the nested species-area relationship: Geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling. Journal of Vegetation Science.
  121. Fekete 1995. Fitocönológia és vegetációtan: hazai aspektusok. Botanikai Közlemények
  122. Gibbins et al. 2010. Identification of Caspian Gull - Part 1: typical birds. Bird Study
  123. Báldi et al. 2016. Wintering Farmland Bird Assemblages in West Hungary. Polish Journal of Ecology
  124. Tryjanowski & Morelli 2015. Presence of Cuckoo reliably indicates high bird diversity: A case studyin a farmland area. Ecological Indicators
  125. Gray & Heezik 2015. Exotic trees can sustain native birds in urban woodlands. Urban Ecosystems
  126. Morelli et al. 2015. Cuckoo and biodiversity: Testing the correlation between species ccurrence and bird species richness in Europe. Biological Conservation
  127. Barnagaud et al. 2013. Species’ thermal preferences affect forest bird communities along landscape and local scale habitat gradients. Ecography
  128. Bairlein 2001. Results of bird ringing in the study of migration routes. Ardea
  129. Lájer 1997. Vázlatok a Carex hartmanii Cajander magyarországi elterjedésérõl, cönológiai viszonyairól. Kitaibelia
  130. Csiky 1997. A Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. fitocönológiai és ökológiai vizsgálata a kunfehértói holdrutás erdőben. Kitaibelia
  131. Keszei 1997. Adatok a fehér sáfrány (Crocus albiflorus KIT. EX SCHULT.) előfordulásának ismeretéhez a Kőszegi-hegységben. Kitaibelia
  132. Molnár & Juhász 2016. Az alacsony libatop (Chenopodium pumilio R.Br.) Zuglóban és új adatok Északkelet-Magyarország idegenhonos fajainak elterjedéséhez. Kitaibelia
  133. Székely & Juhász 1993. Flocking behaviour of tits (Parus spp.) and associated species: the effect of habitat. Ornis Hungarica
  134. Székely & Moskát 1991. Guild structure and seasonal changes in foraging behaviour of birds in a Central-European oak forest. Ornis Hungarica
  135. Moskát & Waliczky 1992. Bird-vegetation relationships along ecological gradients: ordination and plexus analysis. Ornis Hungarica

Nincsenek megjegyzések:

Megjegyzés küldése